The New York Times has a story today about Bush’s “robust” language concerning FISA. The Senate, of course, has already passed a bill that includes the controversial telecom amnesty provision, but the House is thus far holding strong against it. The president warns that it’s “dangerous, just dangerous” to continue to drag out this debate. Of course, considering the telecom amnesty provision is the only real point of contention, and Bush’s own statements that he will veto any bill that comes to his desk without it, he is either lying about the danger, or is more concerned with protecting telecoms than with protecting American citizens personal liberties. Of course, in this administration, there is no law except the law of Bush. If the telecoms were asked to do something illegal by the government, then they were obligated to do so:
Continue Reading…